Quantcast
Channel: Grafana k6 - Grafana Labs Community Forums
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 339

K6 timings seem (very slow)

$
0
0

newly trying out k6, and there’s something i am not getting. if i run the following “test”:

gdate +%s.%N ; curl <demo-url>/clients ;echo "" ; gdate +%s.%N

on my mac, i get a result:

1730735650.745561000
[{"id":1,"name":"Zasu Pitts","email":"pitts@silents.com"},{"id":2,"name":"Theda Bara","email":"bara@silents.com"},{"id":3,"name":"Lon Chaney","email":"chaney@silents.com"},{"id":4,"name":"Clara Bow","email":"clarabow@silents.com"},{"id":5,"name":"Rudolph Valentino","email":"valentino@silents.com"},{"id":6,"name":"Lillian Gish","email":"gish@silents.com"},{"id":7,"name":"John Garfield","email":"garfield@silents.com"},{"id":8,"name":"Douglas Fairbanks","email":"fairbanks@ss.com"},{"id":9,"name":"Buster Keaton","email":"keaton@silents.com"},{"id":10,"name":"Mary Pickford","email":"pickford@silents.com"}]
1730735650.819227000

which looks to me like it took all of 0.07 seconds.

if i run the same as a k6 invocation:

import http from 'k6/http';
import { sleep } from 'k6';

export default function () {
  http.get('http://<demo-url>/clients');
  sleep(1);
}

i get results that seem to me to indicate it took almost a second for the api call:

 k6 run single-test.js

         /\      Grafana   /‾‾/
    /\  /  \     |\  __   /  /
   /  \/    \    | |/ /  /   ‾‾\
  /          \   |   (  |  (‾)  |
 / __________ \  |_|\_\  \_____/

     execution: local
        script: single-test.js
        output: -

     scenarios: (100.00%) 1 scenario, 1 max VUs, 10m30s max duration (incl. graceful stop):
              * default: 1 iterations for each of 1 VUs (maxDuration: 10m0s, gracefulStop: 30s)


     data_received..................: 944 B 902 B/s
     data_sent......................: 132 B 126 B/s
     http_req_blocked...............: avg=18.32ms min=18.32ms med=18.32ms max=18.32ms p(90)=18.32ms p(95)=18.32ms
     http_req_connecting............: avg=16.24ms min=16.24ms med=16.24ms max=16.24ms p(90)=16.24ms p(95)=16.24ms
     http_req_duration..............: avg=22.91ms min=22.91ms med=22.91ms max=22.91ms p(90)=22.91ms p(95)=22.91ms
       { expected_response:true }...: avg=22.91ms min=22.91ms med=22.91ms max=22.91ms p(90)=22.91ms p(95)=22.91ms
     http_req_failed................: 0.00% 0 out of 1
     http_req_receiving.............: avg=165µs   min=165µs   med=165µs   max=165µs   p(90)=165µs   p(95)=165µs
     http_req_sending...............: avg=102µs   min=102µs   med=102µs   max=102µs   p(90)=102µs   p(95)=102µs
     http_req_tls_handshaking.......: avg=0s      min=0s      med=0s      max=0s      p(90)=0s      p(95)=0s
     http_req_waiting...............: avg=22.64ms min=22.64ms med=22.64ms max=22.64ms p(90)=22.64ms p(95)=22.64ms
     http_reqs......................: 1     0.955789/s
     iteration_duration.............: avg=1.04s   min=1.04s   med=1.04s   max=1.04s   p(90)=1.04s   p(95)=1.04s
     iterations.....................: 1     0.955789/s
     vus............................: 1     min=1      max=1
     vus_max........................: 1     min=1      max=1


running (00m01.0s), 0/1 VUs, 1 complete and 0 interrupted iterations
default ✓ [======================================] 1 VUs  00m01.0s/10m0s  1/1 iters, 1 per VU

which, if i am reading correctly, says it took 1.04 seconds. i’ve tried a few different configurations, and that 1 second result is pretty consistent.

so, i assume i am either reading this wrong or implementing it wrong. any help appreciated, thanks

1 post - 1 participant

Read full topic


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 339

Trending Articles